Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262745AbVDHIAZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 04:00:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262743AbVDHH6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:58:38 -0400 Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.29]:52821 "EHLO smtp2.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262739AbVDHHvq (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:51:46 -0400 X-ME-UUID: 20050408075145815.C70191C00236@mwinf0209.wanadoo.fr Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:47:40 +0200 To: Chris Friesen Cc: Josselin Mouette , linux-os@analogic.com, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice. Message-ID: <20050408074740.GC9057@pegasos> References: <4252A821.9030506@almg.gov.br> <1112723637.4878.14.camel@mirchusko.localnet> <4252DDE6.5040500@nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4252DDE6.5040500@nortel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Sven Luther Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1429 Lines: 34 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:50:14PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > >The fact is also that mixing them with a GPLed software gives > >an result you can't redistribute - although it seems many people > >disagree with that assertion now. > > This is only true if the result is considered a "derivative work" of the > gpl'd code. > > The GPL states "In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based > on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on > a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other > work under the scope of this License." > > Since the main cpu does not actually run the binary firmware, the fact > that it lives in main memory with the code that the cpu *does* run is > irrelevent. In this case, the Debian stance is that the kernel proper > and the binary firmware are "merely aggregated" in a volume of storage ( > ie. system memory). The problem is that you can only argue it is mere agregation, if the copyright notice doesn't de-facto put said firmware blobs under the GPL, thus making them undistributable by the selfsame definition of the GPL. Friendly, Sven Luther - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/