Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262898AbVDHUM1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:12:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262942AbVDHUM1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:12:27 -0400 Received: from [217.149.127.10] ([217.149.127.10]:24286 "EHLO stine.vestdata.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262898AbVDHUMW (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:12:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:11:51 +0200 From: Ragnar =?iso-8859-15?Q?Kj=F8rstad?= To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Chris Wedgwood , Matthias-Christian Ott , Andrea Arcangeli , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Uncached stat performace [ Was: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. ] Message-ID: <20050408201150.GL20644@vestdata.no> References: <20050408071428.GB3957@opteron.random> <4256AE0D.201@tiscali.de> <20050408171518.GA4201@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050408180540.GA4522@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050408191638.GA5792@taniwha.stupidest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Zet.no-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Zet.no-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: ragnark@stine.vestdata.no Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 34 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:39:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > One of the reasons I do inode numbers in the "index" file (apart from > checking that the inode hasn't changed) is in fact that "stat()" is damn > slow if it causes seeks. Since your stat loop is entirely > > You can optimize your stat() patterns on traditional unix-like filesystems > by just sorting the stats by inode number (since the inode number is > historically a special index into the inode table - even when filesystems > distribute the inodes over several tables, sorting will generally do the > right thing from a seek perspective). It's a disgusting hack, but it > literally gets you orders-of-magnitude performance improvments in many > real-life cases. It does, so why isn't there a way to do this without the disgusting hack? (Your words, not mine :) ) E.g, wouldn't a aio_stat() allow simular or better speedups in a way that doesn't depend on ext2/3 internals? I bet it would make a significant difference from things like "ls -l" in large uncached directories and imap-servers with maildir? -- Ragnar Kj?rstad Software Engineer Scali - http://www.scali.com Scaling the Linux Datacenter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/