Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261158AbVDHWER (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:04:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261159AbVDHWER (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:04:17 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:64422 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261158AbVDHWEO (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:04:14 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: jonathan@jonmasters.org Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:05:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse , Kernel Mailing List References: <200504071354.34581.phillips@istop.com> <35fb2e59050408102463710324@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <35fb2e59050408102463710324@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504081805.38629.phillips@istop.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 833 Lines: 20 On Friday 08 April 2005 13:24, Jon Masters wrote: > On Apr 7, 2005 6:54 PM, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > So I propose that everybody who is interested, pick one of the above > > projects and join it, to help get it to the point of being able to > > losslessly import the version graph. Given the importance, I think that > > _all_ viable alternatives need to be worked on in parallel, so that two > > months from now we have several viable options. > > What about BitKeeper licensing constraints on such involvement? They don't apply to me, for one. Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/