Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261171AbVDHWXh (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:23:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261169AbVDHWXh (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:23:37 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57]:31687 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261171AbVDHWTk (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:19:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Odd Timer behavior in 2.6 vs 2.4 (1 extra tick) From: Steven Rostedt To: jdavis@accessline.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:19:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1112998770.24574.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 21 On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:39 -0700, jdavis@accessline.com wrote: > > Hello, > > I've created a pretty straight forward timer using setitimer, and noticed > some odd differences between 2.4 and 2.6, I wonder if I could get a > clarification if this is the way it should work, or if I should continue to > try to "fix" it. Hi, could you send me a simple program that shows the latency, then I'll be able to analysis exactly where the problem (if there is a problem) is. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/