Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261176AbVDJBnF (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:43:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261191AbVDJBnF (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:43:05 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:44495 "HELO machine.sinus.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261176AbVDJBnB (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:43:01 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 03:42:59 +0200 From: Petr Baudis To: Phillip Lougher Cc: Linus Torvalds , ross@jose.lug.udel.edu, Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Re: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. Message-ID: <20050410014259.GC9052@pasky.ji.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Phillip Lougher , Linus Torvalds , ross@jose.lug.udel.edu, Kernel Mailing List References: <20050408041341.GA8720@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050408071720.GA23128@jose.lug.udel.edu> <20050409025357.GA9052@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1610 Lines: 35 Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 03:01:12AM CEST, I got a letter where Phillip Lougher told me that... > On Apr 9, 2005 3:53 AM, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > FWIW, I made few small fixes (to prevent some trivial usage errors to > > cause cache corruption) and added scripts gitcommit.sh, gitadd.sh and > > gitlog.sh - heavily inspired by what already went through the mailing > > list. Everything is available at http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/git/ > > (including .dircache, even though it isn't shown in the index), the > > cumulative patch can be found below. The scripts aim to provide some > > (obviously very interim) more high-level interface for git. > > I did a bit of playing about with the changelog generate script, > trying to produce a faster version. The attached version uses a > couple of improvements to be a lot faster (e.g. no recursion in the > common case of one parent). > > FWIW it is 7x faster than makechlog.sh (4.342 secs vs 34.129 secs) and > 28x faster than gitlog.sh (4.342 secs vs 2 mins 4 secs) on my > hardware. You mileage may of course vary. Wow, really impressive! Great work, I've merged it (if you don't object, of course). Wondering why I wasn't in the Cc list, BTW. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ 98% of the time I am right. Why worry about the other 3%. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/