Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:47:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:47:49 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:38962 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 13:47:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Pentium 4 and 2.4/2.5 To: kernel@kvack.org Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:47:40 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), bapper@piratehaven.org (Brian Pomerantz), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "kernel@kvack.org" at Nov 08, 2000 01:27:36 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > What state does it leave the condition codes ? That matters. > > Alan, rep ; nop is one of the suggested 2 byte fillers in the Athon > optimization guide; it's handled during instruction decode and is > completely free. It also has no effect on K6s. Ok. Issue settled. So 'rep nop' is safe. Ok that can get into the spinlocks for 2.2.18 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/