Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262467AbVDLPOH (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262443AbVDLPK7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:10:59 -0400 Received: from rev.193.226.232.28.euroweb.hu ([193.226.232.28]:57822 "EHLO dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262400AbVDLPAH (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:00:07 -0400 To: jamie@shareable.org CC: dan@debian.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk In-reply-to: <20050412143237.GB10995@mail.shareable.org> (message from Jamie Lokier on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:32:37 +0100) Subject: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits) References: <20050411114728.GA13128@infradead.org> <20050411153619.GA25987@nevyn.them.org> <20050411181717.GA1129@nevyn.them.org> <20050411192223.GA3707@nevyn.them.org> <20050411221324.GA10541@nevyn.them.org> <20050412143237.GB10995@mail.shareable.org> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:59:45 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 536 Lines: 16 > Note that NFS checks the permissions on _both_ the client and server, > for a reason. Does it? If I read the code correctly the client checks credentials supplied by the server (or cached). But the server does the actual checking of permissions. Am I missing something? Thanks, Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/