Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262473AbVDLPcM (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:32:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262447AbVDLPba (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:31:30 -0400 Received: from mtk-sms-mail01.digi.com ([66.77.174.18]:33048 "EHLO mtk-sms-mail01.digi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262473AbVDLPaR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:30:17 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:30:19 -0500 Message-ID: <335DD0B75189FB428E5C32680089FB9F122152@mtk-sms-mail01.digi.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Digi Neo 8: linux-2.6.12_r2 jsm driver Thread-Index: AcU/cjQ1+dPc57u5SNeG4sVe3YABjQAAEyaA From: "Kilau, Scott" To: "Christoph Hellwig" Cc: "Ihalainen Nickolay" , , , "Wen Xiong" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1541 Lines: 46 Wendy and I released under the GPL, and as such, I know legally you have the right to modify the code the way you see fit. However, when the copyright holder says "No, please don't add that code", and gives *GOOD* reasons why, you should respect that decision. So if I don't sign off on this change, does the matter? If not, what good is having the sign off section for patches that must go through the maintainer? I would have no problem submitting the other driver (DGNC) for kernel inclusion, and have tried repeatedly in the past. However, I am NOT willing to strip out many of the features our customers, (and as such, your USERS) want, which is what happened with the JSM driver. > There are people who just want the card supported. There's no reason > to deny the driver to them. Oh, it *is* supported, using our GPL'ed DGNC driver available on our ftp/web site. This is not some argument of closed binaries versus open source binaries, As both the JSM and DGNC drivers are completely open source and GPL'ed. This is about having the users of this card end up getting a worse experience by using the JSM driver. However, in case it actually matters, (which I know it won't), "I, Scott Kilau, *DO NOT* sign off on this patch to the JSM driver". Scott Kilau Digi International - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/