Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262245AbVDMGRI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 02:17:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262299AbVDMGRI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 02:17:08 -0400 Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]:17634 "EHLO outmail.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262245AbVDMGRG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 02:17:06 -0400 Message-ID: <425CB996.5090905@qazi.f2s.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:17:58 +0100 From: Asfand Yar Qazi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041010 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Why not GNU Arch instead of BitKeeper? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 546 Lines: 14 Hi, I'm surprised nobody considered GNU Arch (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/) to replace BitKeeper - it was probably started in direct response to the Linux Kernel using a non-free tool. I must say I haven't used it, but from reviews and comparisons I've read, it seems to be a good tool. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/