Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261942AbVDOVuV (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:50:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261943AbVDOVuU (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:50:20 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]:49654 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261942AbVDOVuP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:50:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G84diO9ytaOHEWwZo2vvp6tXd8FU7aEUDj3WBV/dbEGlfIhx4zvqicgKpdGohIwj2QyBcOkd9734N1WwY2jl/pnOoCiaOihFz7n9v7Kk3/E3OjinbunRmHi1SR8+AUq6JKk69sA8CgNZ/cSn9d8z/ngJ51nPS92ZAEg7b/fSllQ= Message-ID: <29495f1d050415144774ec9c44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:47:41 -0700 From: Nish Aravamudan Reply-To: Nish Aravamudan To: Kylene Hall Subject: Re: [PATCH] char/tpm: use msleep(), clean-up timers, fix typo Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050415210402.GA22834@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050310004115.GA32583@kroah.com> <1110415321526@kroah.com> <20050311181816.GC2595@us.ibm.com> <29495f1d0504151344a33ee24@mail.gmail.com> <20050415210402.GA22834@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1161 Lines: 27 On 4/15/05, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:44:55PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 4/15/05, Kylene Hall wrote: > > > I have tested this patch and agree that using msleep is the right. Please > > > apply this patch to the tpm driver. One hunk might fail b/c the > > > typo has been fixed already. > > > > Would you like me to respin the patch, Greg? Or is the failed hunk ok? > > I'm sorry, but I am not in charge of accepting patches for the tpm > driver. Why not go through the listed maintainer for this process, they > should know how to get it into the mainline kernel tree properly. If > not, why would they be listed as the maintainer? :) Kylene, there is no entry in MAINTAINERS as of 2.6.12-rc2 for the TPM driver? Should there be? I am assuming tpmdd_devel can take care of merging the patch and pushing to mainline? Please do so. Thanks, Nish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/