Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:25:12 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@osdl.org, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
       colpatch@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains aka Isolated cpusets
Message-Id: <20050419002512.557478d4.pj@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <1113894584.5074.54.camel@npiggin-nld.site>
References: <1097110266.4907.187.camel@arrakis>
	<20050418202644.GA5772@in.ibm.com>
	<20050418225427.429accd5.pj@sgi.com>
	<1113891575.5074.46.camel@npiggin-nld.site>
	<20050418235902.7632d68a.pj@sgi.com>
	<1113894584.5074.54.camel@npiggin-nld.site>
Organization: SGI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 773
Lines: 21

> > So you do _not_ want to consider nested sched domains, just disjoint
> > ones.  Good.
> > 
> 
> You don't either? Good. :)

>From the point of view of cpusets, I'd rather not think
about nested sched domains, for now at least.

But my scheduler savvy colleagues on the big SGI boxes
may well have ambitions here.  I can't speak for them.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/