Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261467AbVDSMQc (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:16:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261469AbVDSMQc (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:16:32 -0400 Received: from ns.schottelius.org ([213.146.113.242]:6673 "HELO ei.schottelius.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261467AbVDSMQ3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:16:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:15:30 +0200 From: Nico Schottelius To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: /proc/cpuinfo format - arch dependent! Message-ID: <20050419121530.GB23282@schottelius.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nico Schottelius , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 X-Linux-Info: http://linux.schottelius.org/ X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.11.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 26 Hello! When I wrote schwanz3(*) for fun, I noticed /proc/cpuinfo varies very much on different architectures. Is it possible to make it look more identical (as far as the different archs allow it)? So that one at least can count the cpus on every system the same way. If so, who would the one I should contact and who would accept / verify a patch doing that? Greetings, Nico -- Keep it simple & stupid, use what's available. Please use pgp encryption: 8D0E 27A4 is my id. http://nico.schotteli.us | http://linux.schottelius.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/