Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261367AbVDSU0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:26:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261655AbVDSU0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:6848 "EHLO mail.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261367AbVDSU0j (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:26:39 -0400 From: Florian Weimer To: Chuck Wolber Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Development Model References: Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:26:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Chuck Wolber's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:31:43 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87r7h6h5s4.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 798 Lines: 18 * Chuck Wolber: > Has the Linux Kernel reached a point where the majority of developers feel > that (at least for now) no *MAJOR* "rip it out, stomp on it, burn it and > start over" parts of the kernel exist any longer? The IP stack is likely to see some development activity, at leat there are some specs floating around which contain requirements which the current IP routing implementation cannot match (deterministic forwarding and things like that). I don't know if the results will be published and integrated in the main kernel tree, though. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/