Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261414AbVDUH0b (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:26:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261425AbVDUH0b (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:26:31 -0400 Received: from colino.net ([213.41.131.56]:13563 "EHLO paperstreet.colino.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261414AbVDUH0S (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:26:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:26:11 +0200 From: Colin Leroy To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Subject: 2.6.12-rc3 cpufreq compile error on ppc32 Message-ID: <20050421092611.37df940b@colin.toulouse> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2098 Lines: 58 Hi guys, One of Ben's patches ("ppc32: Fix cpufreq problems") went in 2.6.12- rc3, but it depended on another patch that's still in -mm only: add-suspend-method-to-cpufreq-core.patch In addition to this, there's a third patch in -mm that fixes warnings and line length to the previous patch, but it doesn't apply cleanly anymore. It's named add-suspend-method-to-cpufreq-core-warning-fix.patch Here's an updated version. HTH, Signed-off-by: Colin Leroy --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2005-04-21 09:14:28.000000000 +0200 +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2005-04-21 09:18:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -955,7 +955,6 @@ { int cpu = sysdev->id; unsigned int ret = 0; - unsigned int cur_freq = 0; struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy; dprintk("resuming cpu %u\n", cpu); @@ -995,21 +994,24 @@ cur_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu_policy->cpu); if (!cur_freq || !cpu_policy->cur) { - printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: resume failed to assert current frequency is what timing core thinks it is.\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: resume failed to assert " + "current frequency is what timing core " + "thinks it is.\n"); goto out; } if (unlikely(cur_freq != cpu_policy->cur)) { struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; - printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: CPU frequency is %u, " - "cpufreq assumed %u kHz.\n", cur_freq, cpu_policy->cur); + printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: CPU frequency is %u, cpufreq assumed " + "%u kHz.\n", cur_freq, cpu_policy->cur); freqs.cpu = cpu; freqs.old = cpu_policy->cur; freqs.new = cur_freq; - notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list, CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE, &freqs); + notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list, + CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE, &freqs); adjust_jiffies(CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE, &freqs); cpu_policy->cur = cur_freq; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/