Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:30:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:30:19 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:12302 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:30:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:58:55 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Linus Torvalds Cc: lkml , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: Inclusion of zoned inactive/free shortage patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Ok, I understand and I agree with doing _unconditional_ > > "zone_inactive_plenty()" instead of conditional > > "zone_inactive_shortage()". > > > > This way we do not get _strict_ zoned behaviour (with strict I mean only > > doing scanning for zones which have a shortage), making the shortage > > handling smoother and doing "fair" aging in cases where there are not > > specific zones under pressure. > > Cool. > > Willing to write a patch and give it some preliminary testing? Sure. However its not _that_ easy. We do have a global inactive target. There is no perzone inactive shortage, which is needed to calculate "zone_inactive_plenty()". > I also agree with the patch Rik sent in about GFP_HIGHUSER, that's > orthogonal though (even if I suspect it could also have made the > problem _appear_ much much more clearly). Right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/