Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:29:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:29:34 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:24328 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:29:23 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Inclusion of zoned inactive/free shortage patch Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:33:26 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , lkml , Rik van Riel In-Reply-To: <0107190142450I.12129@starship> In-Reply-To: <0107190142450I.12129@starship> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <01071918332601.00317@starship> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Thursday 19 July 2001 01:42, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Yes. The inactive shortage needs to be a function of the length of > the inactive_dirty queue rather than just the amount that free pages > is less than some fixed minimum. Oops, it already is, good :-] > The target length of the > inactive_dirty queue in turn can be a function of the global free > shortage (which is where the minimum free numbers get used) ditto, it's already that way... > and the transfer rate of the disk(s). This we don't do, and afaics, this is the only way to get stability across a really wide range of loads, and on system configurations we can't possibly pre-tune for. > Again, experimental - without careful > work a feedback mechanism like this could oscillate wildly. It's > most probably the way forward in the long run though. > > -- > Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/