Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261204AbVDZBtt (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:49:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261256AbVDZBts (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:49:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:47536 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261204AbVDZBtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:49:41 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:49:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: linux-kernel , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds References: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org> In-Reply-To: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504252149.50735.phillips@istop.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 677 Lines: 19 On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote: > Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is > quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib > compression level, it could probably win across the board. Hi Matt, Congratulations on an impressive demo! How about actually checking the compression vs wall clock theory? And I probably don't have to mention psyco... Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/