Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:25:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:25:42 -0400 Received: from se1.cogenit.fr ([195.68.53.173]:22277 "EHLO cogenit.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:25:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:24:57 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Cornel Ciocirlan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Request for comments Message-ID: <20010719192457.A9181@se1.cogenit.fr> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from ctrl@rdsnet.ro on Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:44:52PM +0300 X-Organisation: Marie's fan club - I Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Cornel Ciocirlan ecrit : [heavy linux networking rewrite in sight] > Is it useful at all ? Point b) above could be implemented in userspace > (Actually I've done a basic skeleton a while ago). Are the others worth > the trouble ? > > What do you gurus think ? * Are you sure of where the cycles are spent when routing >> 20kpps ? I have always been told that the lack of polling/batch processing kills the software router. * What against the (not widely used) CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE ? * mpls is good Did you browse mpls at www.ietf.org (and sourceforge for the current state of mpls-linux) ? * IANAG but it looks like a wait for 2.5 project btw. -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/