Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261742AbVDZRpI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:45:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261550AbVDZRoC (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:44:02 -0400 Received: from mail.dif.dk ([193.138.115.101]:23998 "EHLO saerimmer.dif.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261566AbVDZRnf (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:43:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:46:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Jesper Juhl To: Robert Love Cc: linux-kernel , kpreempt-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: preempt-count oddities - still looking for comments :) In-Reply-To: <1114536937.6851.1.camel@betsy> Message-ID: References: <1114536937.6851.1.camel@betsy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 35 On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Robert Love wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 19:31 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > Replying to myself here since the initial mail got no response. Here's > > hoping that it showing up on the list again draws some comments :-) > > I didn't think it was that big of a deal. ;-) > It's not really that big of a deal. I was just currious if I'd gotten it right since I spend a good deal of time digging for possible reasons for the differences (and finding none). :-) > It seems the right approach. Personally, I would of made the type an > s32, since fixed-sizes seems to be sensible in the thread_info > structure, but an int is the same thing. Cool with me. > I'll update the patch(es) then and use __s32 in the structure and s32 elsewhere. > Acked-by: Robert Love > Thanks. > Robert Love > -- Jesper Juhl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/