Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261712AbVDZRjW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:39:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261732AbVDZRgc (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:36:32 -0400 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:8597 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261718AbVDZRgD (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:36:03 -0400 Subject: Re: preempt-count oddities - still looking for comments :) From: Robert Love To: Jesper Juhl Cc: linux-kernel , kpreempt-tech@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:35:37 -0400 Message-Id: <1114536937.6851.1.camel@betsy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 736 Lines: 20 On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 19:31 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Replying to myself here since the initial mail got no response. Here's > hoping that it showing up on the list again draws some comments :-) I didn't think it was that big of a deal. ;-) It seems the right approach. Personally, I would of made the type an s32, since fixed-sizes seems to be sensible in the thread_info structure, but an int is the same thing. Cool with me. Acked-by: Robert Love Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/