Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261701AbVD0FTi (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:19:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261914AbVD0FTi (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:19:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33445 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261701AbVD0FTX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:19:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:23:04 +0800 From: David Teigland To: Nish Aravamudan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dlm: recovery Message-ID: <20050427052304.GG9963@redhat.com> References: <20050425151239.GD6826@redhat.com> <29495f1d05042509426681c4a0@mail.gmail.com> <20050426072742.GF12096@redhat.com> <29495f1d05042609301d47351e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29495f1d05042609301d47351e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 594 Lines: 15 On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:30:25AM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > The reason I think timers are nicer is that you don't need to nest > wait_event*() in a loop (and really, it looks strange when you do). > Complicated or not, I think they are the "right thing" for this case. OK, that makes sense, I have it changed now. Thanks for the help. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/