Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261507AbVD0NmE (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:42:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261547AbVD0NmD (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:42:03 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:52926 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261507AbVD0Nl5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:41:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:25:47 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: David Teigland , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dlm: build Message-ID: <20050427132547.GY4431@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20050425151333.GH6826@redhat.com> <20050425142525.70e72e93.akpm@osdl.org> <200504260352.j3Q3qGEP010127@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20050426055235.GD12096@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050426055235.GD12096@redhat.com> X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 756 Lines: 22 On 2005-04-26T13:52:35, David Teigland wrote: > Other transports are definately a possibility and something that should be > quite simple since it's all encapsulated in lowcomms as you've mentioned. That begs the question why you have choosen SCTP for the newer DLM versions. Curiousity kills the cat, so I'm asking ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/