Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261299AbVD0NwK (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:52:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261597AbVD0NwI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:52:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:30660 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261525AbVD0Nu6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:50:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:54:28 +0800 From: David Teigland To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dlm: build Message-ID: <20050427135428.GF16502@redhat.com> References: <20050425151333.GH6826@redhat.com> <20050425142525.70e72e93.akpm@osdl.org> <200504260352.j3Q3qGEP010127@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20050426055235.GD12096@redhat.com> <20050427132547.GY4431@marowsky-bree.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050427132547.GY4431@marowsky-bree.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 778 Lines: 19 On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:25:47PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2005-04-26T13:52:35, David Teigland wrote: > > > Other transports are definately a possibility and something that should be > > quite simple since it's all encapsulated in lowcomms as you've mentioned. > > That begs the question why you have choosen SCTP for the newer DLM > versions. Curiousity kills the cat, so I'm asking ;-) Because it allows you to easily take advantage of multi-homing where a node has redundant networks. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/