Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262094AbVD1Mz1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262104AbVD1Mz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:26 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:51413 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262094AbVD1MzW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:21:47 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking Message-ID: <20050428122147.GO21645@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20050425165705.GA11938@redhat.com> <20050427214136.GC938@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <200504272241.04254.phillips@istop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504272241.04254.phillips@istop.com> X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 909 Lines: 23 On 2005-04-27T22:41:04, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Just a couple comments here, more will come as time permits. I know you > > consider cluster file systems to be "obscure" apps... > Oh the contrary, cluster filesystems are the main focus of and reason for the > current submission. He was actually quoting David. And indeed it is very important that the DLM interfaces be generally useful, not just for a specific cluster filesystem; if that was the goal, it would be an internal component only and no need to expose it. -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/