Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:10:53 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, jdike@addtoit.com, bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] uml: fix syscall table by including $(SUBARCH)'s one, for i386
Message-ID: <20050428181053.GQ23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
References: <20050424181909.81B8F33AED@zion>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050424181909.81B8F33AED@zion>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 743
Lines: 18

* blaisorblade@yahoo.it (blaisorblade@yahoo.it) wrote:
> 
> Split the i386 entry.S files into entry.S and syscall_table.S which
> is included in the previous one (so actually there is no difference between
> them) and use the syscall_table.S in the UML build, instead of tracking by
> hand the syscall table changes (which is inherently error-prone).

Xen can use this as well (it was on my todo list).

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/