Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262859AbVD2Ryu (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:54:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262860AbVD2Ryu (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:54:50 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:52179 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262859AbVD2Ryj (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:54:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Tom Lord cc: mpm@selenic.com, seanlkml@sympatico.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark In-Reply-To: <200504291734.KAA25263@emf.net> Message-ID: References: <200504291734.KAA25263@emf.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1724 Lines: 47 On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Tom Lord wrote: > > 1) the ancestry of their modified tree > > 2) the complete contents of their modified tree > > 3) input data for a patching program (let's call it "PATCH") > which, at the very least, satisfies the equation: > > MOD_TREE = PATCH (this_diff, ORIG_TREE) > > On the other hand, signing documents which represent a {(1),(3)} pair > with robust accuracy is, in most cases, much much less expensive than > signing {(1),(2)} pairs with robust accuracy. Not so. It may be less expensive in your world, but that's the whole point of git: it's _not_ less expensive in the git world. In the git world, 1 and 2 aren't even separate things. They go together. And you just sign it. End of story. It's so cheap to sign that it's not even funny. More importantly, signing 3 is meaningless. 3 only makes sense with a known starting point. You should never sign a patch without also saying what you're patching. And once you do that, 1+2 and 1+3 are _exactly_ the same thing. And since git always works on the 1+2 level, it would be inexcusably stupid to sign anything but that. 3 doesn't even exist per se, although it's obviously fully defined by 1+2. So I don't see your point. You complain about git signing, but you complain on grounds that do not _exist_ in git, and then your alternative (1+3) which is senseless in a git world doesn't actually end up being anything really different - just more expensive. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/