Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263122AbVD3CCf (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:02:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263125AbVD3CCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:02:33 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]:4061 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263122AbVD3CC2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:02:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Cwnm6pKYeG/Dpv4JgupzN32MzRy553+q3JCQyPLk93tQVMamdft5XWnvNKTJphF++k8DCmGN0Igo1sR2XlZ2T6cg75B4LF8NUA42A17HIjl0KFezHhpYBSFbdBwFtpP3MLnHdDvsizIa4Z11EPR9LnmT7LePq+YyYg05YkoAa3Y= Message-ID: <9cde8bff05042919025d077eb1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:02:27 +0900 From: aq Reply-To: aq To: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/Kconfig: more consistent configuration of XFS Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , lkml In-Reply-To: <20050429212835.GD8699@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <9cde8bff050428005528ecf692@mail.gmail.com> <20050428080914.GA10799@infradead.org> <9cde8bff0504280138b979c08@mail.gmail.com> <20050428083922.GA11542@infradead.org> <9cde8bff05042802213ec650e0@mail.gmail.com> <20050429212835.GD8699@mars.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1327 Lines: 40 On 4/30/05, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:21:52PM +0900, aq wrote: > > > > OK, here is another patch. It is up to Andrew to pick the approriate. > > But I still prefer the first patch, which provides both consistency in > > interface and configuration. > > We shall do out best to distribute info to places where it belongs. > A much better approch would be to move all ext2 + ext3 stuff out in > their respective directories. > When modifying xfs (or ext2,ext3) no files outside their respective > directories should in need to be touched - this would just impose > additional burden doing parrallel development. OK, I agree. > > About your modifications: > > Skipping the menu part is OK. > While you are modifying Kconfig in xfs/ put a > > if XFS_FS > ... > endif > > around all config options expcept the one defining the XFS_FS option. > This will fix menu identing. Thanks for pointing this out. But the patch I posted is fair enough. It just move one menu item around, and change nothing else. Are you happy with it? regards, aq - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/