Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261318AbVD3SIN (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:08:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261321AbVD3SIN (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:08:13 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.130]:31470 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261318AbVD3SIF (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:08:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC] Adding multiple block allocation From: Mingming Cao Reply-To: cmm@us.ibm.com To: suparna@in.ibm.com Cc: Badari Pulavarty , Andrew Morton , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , linux-kernel , ext2-devel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050430171111.GA4265@in.ibm.com> References: <1113304715.2404.39.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk> <1113348434.4125.54.camel@dyn318043bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <1113388142.3019.12.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk> <1114207837.7339.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114659912.16933.5.camel@mindpipe> <1114715665.18996.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050429135211.GA4539@in.ibm.com> <427280C1.8090404@us.ibm.com> <1114816980.10473.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430161043.GB3941@in.ibm.com> <20050430171111.GA4265@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM LTC Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:07:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1114884473.13725.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1712 Lines: 38 On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 22:41 +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:40:43PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:22:59PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 11:45 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > > I touch tested your patch earlier and seems to work fine. Lets integrate > > > > Mingming's getblocks() patches with this and see if we get any benifit > > > > from the whole effort. > > > > > > > > > > I tried Suparna's mpage_writepages_getblocks patch with my > > > ext3_get_blocks patch, seems to work fine, except that still only one > > > block is allocated at a time. I got a little confused.... > > > > > > I did not see any delayed allocation code in your patch, I assume you > > > have to update ext3_prepare_write to not call ext3_get_block, so that > > > block allocation will be defered at ext3_writepages time. So without the > > > delayed allocation part, the get_blocks in mpage_writepages is doing > > > multiple blocks look up only, right? > > > > That's right - so you could try it with mmapped writes (which don't > > go through a prepare write) or with Badari's patch to not call > > ext3_get_block in prepare write. > > BTW, I hope you are running with NOBH. No, it was not run with NOBH. Why we need to turn on nobh here? There are some issue running fsx tests with both patches, w/o direct io option. I will spend more time on this next week. thanks, Mingming - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/