Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261155AbVEBJKo (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 05:10:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261166AbVEBJKo (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 05:10:44 -0400 Received: from smtp208.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.130.116]:10417 "HELO smtp208.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261155AbVEBJKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 05:10:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4275EE8B.5030201@yahoo.com.au> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 19:10:35 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dino@in.ibm.com CC: Paul Jackson , Simon Derr , lkml , lse-tech , Matthew Dobson , Dipankar Sarma , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5) References: <20050501190947.GA5204@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20050501190947.GA5204@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 880 Lines: 28 Dinakar Guniguntala wrote: > Ok, Here is the minimal patchset that I had promised after the > last discussion. > The sched-domains part of it (kernel/sched.c) is looking much better now. Haven't had a really good look, but it is definitely on the right track now. Well done. As I said before, I am not expert on the cpusets side of things, but as far as sched-domains partitioning goes, we really just want the absolute minimum support in kernel/sched.c which can be managed by a higher layer. I'll review it in detail when it gets into -mm, but I don't expect to find any major problems. Thanks, Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/