Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261347AbVEBP4a (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 11:56:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261355AbVEBP4M (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 11:56:12 -0400 Received: from prgy-npn1.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.37]:15754 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261347AbVEBPzc (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 11:55:32 -0400 Message-ID: <42764C0C.8030604@tmr.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 11:49:32 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Arcangeli CC: Matt Mackall , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark References: <20050429203959.GC21897@waste.org><20050429203959.GC21897@waste.org> <20050430025211.GP17379@opteron.random> In-Reply-To: <20050430025211.GP17379@opteron.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1485 Lines: 39 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 01:39:59PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote: > >>Mercurial is ammenable to rsync provided you devote a read-only >>repository to it on the client side. In other words, you rsync from >>kernel.org/mercurial/linus to local/linus and then you merge from >>local/linus to your own branch. Mercurial's hashing hierarchy is >>similar to git's (and Monotone's), so you can sign a single hash of >>the tree as well. > > > Ok fine. It's also interesting how you already enabled partial transfers > through http. > > Please apply this patch so it doesn't fail on my setup ;) > > --- mercurial-0.4b/hg.~1~ 2005-04-29 02:52:52.000000000 +0200 > +++ mercurial-0.4b/hg 2005-04-30 00:53:02.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -#!/usr/bin/python > +#!/usr/bin/env python > # > # mercurial - a minimal scalable distributed SCM > # v0.4b "oedipa maas" Could you explain why this is necessary or desirable? I looked at what env does, and I am missing the point of duplicating bash normal behaviour regarding definition of per-process environment entries. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/