Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261492AbVEBQmB (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 12:42:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261452AbVEBQ1u (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 12:27:50 -0400 Received: from prgy-npn1.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.37]:19338 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261414AbVEBQPS (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 12:15:18 -0400 Message-ID: <42765212.8030605@tmr.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:15:14 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel To: Sean CC: Tom Lord , torvalds@osdl.org, mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark References: <200504291854.LAA26550@emf.net><2712.10.10.10.24.1114799620.squirrel@linux1> <2944.10.10.10.24.1114802002.squirrel@linux1> In-Reply-To: <2944.10.10.10.24.1114802002.squirrel@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1576 Lines: 38 Sean wrote: > On Fri, April 29, 2005 2:54 pm, Tom Lord said: > > >>The process should not rely on the security of every developer's >>machine. The process should not rely on simply trusting quality >>contributors by reputation (e.g., most cons begin by establishing >>trust and continue by relying inappropriately on >>trust-without-verification). This relates to why Linus' >>self-advertised process should be raising yellow and red cards all >>over the place: either he is wasting a huge amount of his own time and >>should be largely replaced by an automated patch queue manager, or he >>is being trusted to do more than is humanly possible. >> > > > Ahh, you don't believe in the development model that has produced Linux! > Personally I do believe in it, so much so that I question the value of > signatures at the changeset level. To me it doesn't matter where the code > came from just so long as it works. Lawyers must love you... That approach doesn't work in court. Related: look at the new software patent law, it ignores the existing law, judge and jury, and lets MS avoid paying the judgement for a suit it already lost. See Computerworld etc for details. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/