Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:38:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:38:36 -0500 Received: from panic.ohr.gatech.edu ([130.207.47.194]:52745 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:38:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3A09E3E5.7A8EB9DB@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 18:38:13 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.0test11pre1ac1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org the network driver changes look ok except for: epic100: * CARDBUS is never defined. Should that be CONFIG_CARDBUS? * just increment the version number. There's no need to add "a" on the end... this version number just differentiates us from the 'canonical' Donald Becker version of epic100.c. net/atm/pvc: return the error value from sock_register, not toss it away. ramfs comments: * Hang on to the ramfs changes for a day or two, there is kmap cleanup (now returns void*) going to Linus RSN. * Does ramfs_statfs() need that sb lock in it? Sure free_pages/inodes might be getting updated on some other CPU, but its statfs so who cares... * the default ramfs maxsize, half of all RAM, seems a little conservative. * there is no need to kmalloc a private superblock structure, when room is already allocated inside the superblock structure for private data. (sb->u) * I wonder if we really need removepage added to struct address_space? That's one API change we shouldn't throw in without discussion, IMHO... it screams "ramfs-specific hack in core code!" void __remove_inode_page(struct page *page) { + struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping; + + if (mapping && mapping->a_ops && mapping->a_ops->removepage) + mapping->a_ops->removepage(page); + And finally, don't you need to EXPORT_SYMBOL pm_devs_lock ? -- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | Would you like a Twinkie? MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/