Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261313AbVECCh1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 22:37:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261314AbVECCh1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 22:37:27 -0400 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:28041 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261313AbVECChN (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2005 22:37:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 11:35:32 +0900 From: "Hyok S. Choi" Subject: [Benchmark] Linux 2.6.11.6 ARM MMU mode vs. noMMU mode vs. MVista 2.4.20 In-reply-to: To: uClinux development list , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: CE Linux Developers List Message-id: <0IFW003QR79WYC@mmp1.samsung.com> Organization: Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd. MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcU1BWcNVc0V74LDSaahcUiPaBabRQAAA+EQAF6QSaAGQZe5wAAAYLmA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 553 Lines: 19 FYI, I just put an newer lmbench lat_ctx benchmark result chart, among linux 2.6.11.6 noMMU mode vs. MMU mode vs. montavista linux(2.4.20-mvista) at: http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document/ctx-perf-linux-2.6.11.6.pdf you can find some graphs also at : http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document.html Hyok - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/