Return-Path: Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:35:14 -0500 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:34:40 -0500 Received: from PO9.ANDREW.CMU.EDU ([128.2.10.109]:34641 "EHLO po9.andrew.cmu.edu") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:33:56 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:32:39 -0500 (EST) From: James R Bruce To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: [OT] Re: fork bomb:the come back Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 1433 Lines: 33 Excerpts from internet.computing.linux-kernel: 28-Dec-99 Re: fork bomb:the come back by Stephen Frost@mail.snowm > There was a Coke machine at a university somewhere that would tell you > how many cans and whatnot were left at one point or another, I seem to recall. > Yes, over the internet (Or that may have been arpanet, not sure. :) ). That would be Carnegie Mellon's CS department coke machine. Sadly, it has been disconnected. There is a coffee machine online now however: mrcoffee.res.cmu.edu I think the general argument trying to be made is that there are a lot of machines that are not, and will never be, connected to the internet. The exact numbers don't matter, but it is worth noting that improvements that only apply to non-connected machines can still be quite useful to many. I would still guess that most embedded systems aren't connected to the internet; for every new machine on the internet, there's probably two more new ones that aren't; The sheer number of computers in other words, is growing faster than the number online. Also, a lot of such systems are networked but not connected to the outside world; since they tend to be proprietary and often trusted (e.g. they lack internal security). - Jim Bruce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/