Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261179AbVECQWt (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2005 12:22:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261189AbVECQWs (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2005 12:22:48 -0400 Received: from prgy-npn1.prodigy.com ([207.115.54.37]:45965 "EHLO oddball.prodigy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261179AbVECQWa (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2005 12:22:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4277A208.8000309@tmr.com> Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:08:40 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm2 References: <20050430164303.6538f47c.akpm@osdl.org> <20050501222630.2fed0bd7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050501222630.2fed0bd7.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2042 Lines: 44 Andrew Morton wrote: > James Cloos wrote: > >>Apologies if this has already been asked and I missed it, but do you >>expect to transition to exporting your working tree via git, now that >>licensing concerns are not part of the equation? >> > > > Nope. At any particular point in time the tree I have here has lots of > problems - failing to compile, crashing, etc. It takes me from four hours > to three days just to get a halfway-respectable release out the door. > > So there's no way in which I'd want to make the tree-of-the-minute > externally available - it would muck people around too much and would cause > me to get a ton of email about stuff which I'd probably already fixed. > > That, plus a traditional SCM is an inappropriate format for something like > -mm. This tree is a series of patches against Linus's tree - that's how it > is developed, tested and sent upstream. Patches get added, dropped, > reordered and merged at any time. It's hard to explain - you need to have > used patch-scripts or quilt for a while... > > Prematurely flattening all this into an SCM view is a fairly pointless > exercise - the only reason for doing it would be for people to be able to > download it. And they can do that by grabbing the single diff anyway. I > suppose someone might start offering git -mm trees sometime, as an > alternative to grabbing the diff file. For all of the reasons you describe putting up your tree would be a waste of time, and putting up another tree is likely to only result in duplicated effort; the folks who want SCC can use whatever works for them and then send you patches. -- -bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/