Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261902AbVECXPX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2005 19:15:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261904AbVECXPW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2005 19:15:22 -0400 Received: from mail.tyan.com ([66.122.195.4]:36882 "EHLO tyanweb.tyan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261902AbVECXPP (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2005 19:15:15 -0400 Message-ID: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C943142309B07D70@TYANWEB> From: YhLu To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: x86-64 dual core mapping Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:35:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1072 Lines: 35 Thanks. For dual core cpu, if the BIOS or LinuxBIOS disable the dual core, the kernel will treat core0 of node 1 as core 1 of node 0..... YH > -----Original Message----- > From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@suse.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:25 AM > To: YhLu > Cc: Andi Kleen; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: x86-64 dual core mapping > > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0700, YhLu wrote: > > Andi, > > > > resent. FYI > > I retested with my tree and everything works for me as expected. > Well actually there is a problem with the core mappings, but > not on dual core, but on single core (more cosmetic than real) > > It is possible that some patch is missing again in mainline. > I will sync up my patchkit next week and double check then > that mainline is in the same state as mine. > > -Andi > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/