Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261824AbVEDNlU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 09:41:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261825AbVEDNlT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 09:41:19 -0400 Received: from levante.wiggy.net ([195.85.225.139]:2176 "EHLO mx1.wiggy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261824AbVEDNlR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 09:41:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 15:41:15 +0200 From: Wichert Akkerman To: "Richard B. Johnson" Cc: Linux kernel Subject: Re: System call v.s. errno Message-ID: <20050504134115.GB23566@wiggy.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Richard B. Johnson" , Linux kernel References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 17 Previously Richard B. Johnson wrote: > Does anybody know for sure if global 'errno' is supposed to > be altered after a successful system call? It's not. Also this is not a kernel related question: errno is managed by libc. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/