Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261238AbVEDSHp (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 14:07:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261246AbVEDSFy (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 14:05:54 -0400 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([24.172.12.4]:65040 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261238AbVEDR7v (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 13:59:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 13:59:33 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy Message-ID: <20050504175932.GB10345@tuxdriver.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050504170156.87F67CE5@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050504170156.87F67CE5@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 688 Lines: 19 On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:01:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments > has changed over the last few years. Mailers have been getting > a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body > plain/text attachments in replies. Personally, I hate seeing patches as attachments. No offense, but I hope this patch is ignored. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/