Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261289AbVEDSOn (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 14:14:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261311AbVEDSOb (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 14:14:31 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:4287 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261289AbVEDSOS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 May 2005 14:14:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy From: Dave Hansen To: Chris Wright Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050504175535.GT23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20050504170156.87F67CE5@kernel.beaverton.ibm.com> <200505041716.j44HGPbV016851@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1115227516.22718.4.camel@localhost> <20050504175535.GT23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 11:14:10 -0700 Message-Id: <1115230450.22718.14.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 814 Lines: 21 On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 10:55 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > I agree that things are better. But, ironically, this patch is a case > in point. It's attached as text/x-patch and makes replying to and > commenting on patch inline more laborious. Well, crap. I've sent an awful lot of patches that way, and never had a negative reply from a maintainer or a patch commenter. As an aside: is there a proper way to do patch text/plain attachments from Evolution? Maybe we need a quick tutorial on what the best way to send patches is with several popular mailers. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/