Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262100AbVEENQR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2005 09:16:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262097AbVEENQP (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2005 09:16:15 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:1717 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262100AbVEENPJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2005 09:15:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 18:58:21 +0530 From: Dinakar Guniguntala To: Matthew Dobson Cc: Nick Piggin , Paul Jackson , Simon Derr , lkml , lse-tech , Dipankar Sarma , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5) Message-ID: <20050505132820.GB4028@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: dino@in.ibm.com References: <20050501190947.GA5204@in.ibm.com> <4277F52B.8040908@us.ibm.com> <42781286.7080801@yahoo.com.au> <42781724.3010703@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42781724.3010703@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 587 Lines: 14 On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:28:20PM -0700, Matthew Dobson wrote: > > build_disjoint_sched_domains(partition1, partition2)? Or just > partition_sched_domains(partition1, partition2)? Partition and disjoint > seem mildly redundant to me, for varying definitions of partition... ;) partition_sched_domains sounds fine to me, Thanks -Dinakar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/