Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261192AbVEFJGJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 05:06:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261195AbVEFJGJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 05:06:09 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:53478 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261192AbVEFJGA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 05:06:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 02:05:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Andries Brouwer Cc: chrisw@osdl.org, aebr@win.tue.nl, rddunlap@osdl.org, greg@kroah.com, joecool1029@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Empty partition nodes not created (was device node issues with recent mm's and udev) Message-Id: <20050506020518.0b0afdc3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050506084259.GB25418@apps.cwi.nl> References: <20050503031421.GA528@kroah.com> <20050502202620.04467bbd.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20050506080056.GD4604@pclin040.win.tue.nl> <20050506081009.GX23013@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20050506084259.GB25418@apps.cwi.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1589 Lines: 43 Andries Brouwer wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:10:09AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Andries Brouwer (aebr@win.tue.nl) wrote: > > > No, there is no problem but an intentional change in behaviour in -mm > > > and now also in 2.6.11.8. > > > > I think this should be backed out of -stable. > > I was surprised to find it in, after I had written > > ============ > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:58:07 +0200 > > For the time being, although I do not object to the patch, > obviously, since it is my own, I cannot see any reason to > add it to the "fixed" release. > ============ > > but maybe including it was done by mistake? > It wasn't mentioned, I think, in the changelog. > > There was a report that it fixed an oops, > but the report is unconfirmed and ununderstood. > > Should it be backed out of 2.6.11.8? Possibly - but if it will be > part of 2.6.12 or 2.6.13 then I would be inclined to leave it. > > Andrew asks whether it should be removed from -mm. It was merged into Linus's tree on March 8th (via bk, thank gawd. How do you find out that sort of info using git? Generating a full log is cheating). > Will first read all my mail and then reply to that letter. > Maybe you should coordinate with Andrew and take the same decision. I'm proposing that we revert that change from Linus's tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/