Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261225AbVEFNxE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 09:53:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261199AbVEFNw6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 09:52:58 -0400 Received: from [213.170.72.194] ([213.170.72.194]:60902 "EHLO shelob.oktetlabs.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261225AbVEFNwo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 09:52:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] __wait_on_freeing_inode fix From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: akpm@osdl.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MTD Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 17:52:42 +0400 Message-Id: <1115387562.27158.39.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 909 Lines: 23 > Compile tested only. This condition is very hard to trigger normally > (simultaneous clear_inode() with iget()) so probably only heavy stress > testing can reveal any change of behavior. Well, my stress test works fine with your patch. I've tested it on JFFS2 FS which works on top of RAM-emulated flash. I tried it together with my patch since otherwise the stress test crashes due to the race that my patch fixes. On vanilla linux-2.6.11.5 the stress test usually crashes in about 5 minutes, but linux-2.6.11.5 + the 2 patches (as well as + only one my patch) it is stable for 2 hours already. -- Best Regards, Artem B. Bityuckiy, St.-Petersburg, Russia. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/