Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261323AbVEFXC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 19:02:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261322AbVEFXAR (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 19:00:17 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:56079 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261336AbVEFW6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2005 18:58:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 23:58:42 +0100 From: Russell King To: Andrew Morton , davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering Message-ID: <20050506235842.A23651@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , davej@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050302230634.A29815@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <42265023.20804@pobox.com> <20050303002733.GH10124@redhat.com> <20050302203812.092f80a0.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304105247.B3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050304032632.0a729d11.akpm@osdl.org> <20050304113626.E3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050304113626.E3932@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk on Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:36:26AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2621 Lines: 62 On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:36:26AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:26:32AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Russell King wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:38:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate level of > > > > visibility on this mailing list? > > > > > > Looking at the http://l4x.org/k/ site, it appears that all -mm versions > > > have broken ARM support with the defconfig, while Linus kernels at least > > > build fine. > > > > It's very much in an arch maintainer's interest to make sure that > > cross-compilers are easily obtainable. Any hints? > > Been trying to achieve that since it's a FAQ on ARM lists. Even gone to > the extent of setting up a separate mailing list, getting a volunteer to > track what people want and do the hard work to build them. That was > about 6 months ago, and I haven't seen any results. > > I was thinking at the time "great, this is one problem which should be > solved". How silly of me. It seems, yet again, that it comes down to > a case of "if rmk doesn't do it, it won't get done." Sad but true. > Now, why do I keep feeling that I'm being taken advantage of all the > time? Could it be the complete lack of productive help from anyone else. > > Anyway, going back to why -mm doesn't work: > > arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0xb64): In function `$a': > : undefined reference to `rd_size' > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > So "rd_size" got deleted in -mm kernels without reference to anyone else > who's using it. Greeeeaaatttt.... And guess what? This patch is now in Linus kernel. Greeeeaaaattttt stuff whoever did that. Truely wonderful job. Thanks for taking notice of me a month ago. I really appreciate it. Especially when stuff gets merged which has already been pointed out as needlessly _BREAKING_ stuff. Linus - please revert the change which caused this. CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x9d4): In function `$a': : undefined reference to `rd_size' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/