Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:21:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:21:50 -0400 Received: from woody.ichilton.co.uk ([216.29.174.40]:6921 "EHLO woody.ichilton.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:21:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 16:21:50 +0100 From: Ian Chilton To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: OT: Journaling FS Comparison Message-ID: <20010722162150.A23381@woody.ichilton.co.uk> Reply-To: Ian Chilton Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Hello, If this question is already covered somewhere by a web page or article, then please drop me the URL, but I have not seen such a thing, so was wondering if someof the developers of the journaling filesystems could comment on the progress of the systems. I'd also be interested in knowing what journaling fs the developers around here use in general... With there been 4 of them (ext3, reiserfs, XFS and JFS), it's not an easy choice for anyone. ext3 stands out because of it's compatibility with ext2 - this makes it easy to 'upgrade' from ext2 to ext3 without loosing/moving data. Also it would be much easier to move a drive into another machine without worrying about the kernel having reiserfs etc compiled in. However, I have heard ext3 is slower (obviously because it has extra writes) and sometimes has instibilities. I also heard that ReiserFS is the fastest out of the bunch, but all data is lost on converstion, and obviously rescuing and moving disks is harder. But, it is in the main kernel tree.. Anyway, maybe someone could comment on the different options across the filesystems, like speed, stable?, nfs?, raid?, convert from ext2? Also, while I am posting off topic, as part of going to a journaling fs, I was considering moving my nfs/netboot server from 2.2.19 to 2.4.x - how's the nfs code working on 2.4, compared to 2.2, especially speed wise? Thanks in Advance! Bye for Now, Ian \|||/ (o o) /-----------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo----------------------------\ | Ian Chilton E-Mail: ian@ichilton.co.uk | | IRC Nick: GadgetMan Backup: ichilton@www.linux.org.uk | | ICQ: 16007717 / 104665842 Web : http://www.ichilton.co.uk | |--------------------------------------------------------------------| | For people who like peace and quiet: a phoneless cord | \--------------------------------------------------------------------/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/