Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262889AbVEHQHU (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2005 12:07:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262890AbVEHQHU (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2005 12:07:20 -0400 Received: from mail.nagafix.co.uk ([213.228.237.37]:61604 "EHLO mail.nagafix.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262889AbVEHQHR (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2005 12:07:17 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.11.8 + UML/x86_64 (2.6.12-rc3+) = oops From: Antoine Martin To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com In-Reply-To: References: <20050504191828.620C812EE7@sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net> <1115248927.12088.52.camel@cobra> <1115392141.12197.3.camel@cobra> <1115483506.12131.33.camel@cobra> <1115570102.10373.23.camel@cobra> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 18:38:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1115573938.10373.46.camel@cobra> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4-3mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 503 Lines: 12 > Ok, the bug is found now. It is a kernel bug that it allows to set > non canonical addresses in 64bit segment registers through ptrace. Is this going to be part of 2.6.11.9 or just 2.6.12? I've got a good test environment now if you need testers. Antoine - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/