Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262916AbVEHSTY (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2005 14:19:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262917AbVEHSTY (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2005 14:19:24 -0400 Received: from mail.nagafix.co.uk ([213.228.237.37]:29831 "EHLO mail.nagafix.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262916AbVEHSTU (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2005 14:19:20 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.11.8 + UML/x86_64 (2.6.12-rc3+) = oops From: Antoine Martin To: Jeff Dike Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050508164514.GD25130@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20050504191828.620C812EE7@sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net> <1115248927.12088.52.camel@cobra> <1115392141.12197.3.camel@cobra> <1115483506.12131.33.camel@cobra> <1115570102.10373.23.camel@cobra> <20050508164514.GD25130@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 20:51:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1115581886.10373.64.camel@cobra> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4-3mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1275 Lines: 29 On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 12:45 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:35:02PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > > The only extra patch applied on top of what is on the web page (as per > > Jeff's instructions) is the mconsole-exec patch, and AFAIK it wouldn't > > affect the code above. > > mconsole-exec, if it's the patch I'm thinking of, is a patch to the UML > kernel, not to the host. Yep, that's the one, I thought the question was about the guest. The host is running 2.6.11.8 - no extra patches at all. > > The really weird thing is that the processes are still running, but ps > > -ef shows an empty string in place of the process name: > > (and the terminal which launched the instance got control back) > > I am now rebuilding a new kernel on another test box, let me know what > > to do to provide better debug information. > > It's not unusual for UML processes to have strange names (including empty > ones) on the host. Strange thing is, they had names up to the point where I got the segfault. Antoine - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/