Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:53:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:53:48 -0400 Received: from cx97923-a.phnx3.az.home.com ([24.9.112.194]:32924 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:53:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3B5B4B64.712A7955@candelatech.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 14:53:40 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] Sony VAIO, 2.4.7: CardBus failures with Tulip & 3c575 cards. In-Reply-To: <200107222059.f6MKx2212465@penguin.transmeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing dump_pirq ouput is found below. Linus Torvalds wrote: > > In article <3B5B1F77.D8B45FFA@candelatech.com> you write: > > > >This report contains information about my failure to get my > >CardBus NICs working correctly. Hardware involved is: > > > >Sony VAIO PCG-FX210 laptop (800Mhz Duron...) > >DFE-650 16-bit PCMCIA NIC x2 > >3Com Megahertz 32-bit 3CCFE575BT NIC x2 > >AmbiCom 32-bit 8100 NIC (tulip) x2 > > This looks suspiciously like your slot #1 gets the PCI interrupt routing > wrong. > > Note especially the kernel reports: > > Linux Kernel Card Services 3.1.22 > options: [pci] [cardbus] [pm] > PCI: Assigned IRQ 9 for device 00:0a.0 > PCI: Assigned IRQ 10 for device 00:0a.1 > IRQ routing conflict for 00:07.5, have irq 5, want irq 10 > IRQ routing conflict for 00:07.6, have irq 5, want irq 10 > PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:10.0 > > it really looks like your slot 1 controller (00:0a.1) really wants irq5, > based on the fact that other devices are reported to have irq5. > > However, if they _really_ have irq5 already routed, I'm surprised that > the PCI irq router "r->get()" function didn't pick up on that fact, and > that the "set" function apparently didn't work correctly. > > So I'd guess that when you insert a card in slot #1, you get a constant > stream of interrupts on irq5, which is not where the kernel is expecting > them, so your machine locks up. > > Can you do the following: > - run dump_pirq on your machine (attached) Ok, I found a dump_pirq script on the web, maybe it does what you want: Interrupt routing table found at address 0xfdf60: Version 1.0, size 0x0080 Interrupt router is device 00:07.0 PCI exclusive interrupt mask: 0x0000 [] Compatible router: vendor 0x1106 device 0x0596 Device 00:07.0 (slot 0): ISA bridge INTA: link 0x55, irq mask 0x9eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,15] INTB: link 0x56, irq mask 0x9eb8 [3,4,5,7,9,10,11,12,15] INTC: link 0x56, irq mask 0x9cb8 [3,4,5,7,10,11,12,15] INTD: link 0x57, irq mask 0x06a0 [5,7,9,10] Device 00:00.0 (slot 0): Host bridge INTA: link 0x55, irq mask 0xdef8 [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,15] INTB: link 0x56, irq mask 0xdef8 [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,15] INTC: link 0x56, irq mask 0xdef8 [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,15] INTD: link 0x57, irq mask 0xdef8 [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,14,15] Device 00:01.0 (slot 0): PCI bridge INTA: link 0x56, irq mask 0x0020 [5] Device 00:0a.0 (slot 0): CardBus bridge INTA: link 0x55, irq mask 0x0020 [5] INTB: link 0x56, irq mask 0x0020 [5] Device 00:10.0 (slot 0): Ethernet controller INTA: link 0x56, irq mask 0x0400 [10] Device 00:0e.0 (slot 0): FireWire (IEEE 1394) INTA: link 0x57, irq mask 0x0200 [9] Interrupt router at 00:07.0: VIA 82C686 PCI-to-ISA bridge PIRQA (link 0x01): irq 9 PIRQB (link 0x02): irq 10 PIRQC (link 0x03): irq 5 PIRQD (link 0x05): irq 9 -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/