Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261624AbVEJMa7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 08:30:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261625AbVEJMa7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 08:30:59 -0400 Received: from ZIVLNX17.UNI-MUENSTER.DE ([128.176.188.79]:54470 "EHLO ZIVLNX17.uni-muenster.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261624AbVEJMaq (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 08:30:46 -0400 From: Borislav Petkov To: coywolf@lovecn.org Subject: Re: kexec? Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:15:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Ralf Hildebrandt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050508202050.GB13789@charite.de> <20050509183428.6d7934a6.rddunlap@osdl.org> <2cd57c9005051000004c57050@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2cd57c9005051000004c57050@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505101215.48993.petkov@uni-muenster.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2549 Lines: 78 On Tuesday 10 May 2005 09:00, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > On 5/10/05, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > On Sun, 8 May 2005 22:20:50 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > | I know kexec used to be a patch, but has it gone into the mainstream > > | kernels yet? > > > > Nope, it's only in the -mm patchset. > > Testing/reporting that could help.... > > coywolf@prodigy:~/kexec-tools-1.95/objdir/build/bin$ ./kexec_test > Segmentation fault > > prodigy:/home/coywolf/kexec-tools-1.95/objdir/build/sbin# ./kexec -l > /var/local/build/vmlinux > kexec_load failed: Cannot assign requested address > entry = (nil) > nr_segments = 2 > segment[0].buf = 0x80b4558 > segment[0].bufsz = 15c > segment[0].mem = (nil) > segment[0].memsz = 15c > segment[1].buf = 0xb7d53008 > segment[1].bufsz = 2a0086 > segment[1].mem = 0x100000 > segment[1].memsz = 2c8a78 > > prodigy:/home/coywolf/kexec-tools-1.95/objdir/build/sbin# ./kexec -l > /var/local/build/arch/i386/boot/bzImage > kexec_load failed: Cannot assign requested address > entry = 0x91734 > nr_segments = 2 > segment[0].buf = 0x80b4480 > segment[0].bufsz = 1850 > segment[0].mem = 0x90000 > segment[0].memsz = 1850 > segment[1].buf = 0xb7eaa008 > segment[1].bufsz = 14032d > segment[1].mem = 0x100000 > segment[1].memsz = 14032d Hi, I've been doing some kexec tests (as described in Documentation/kdump.txt) too but can't get to load the image and get similar error messages. Let me know if you need more info about the hardware. The first_kernel was booted with "crashkernel=64M@16M" and the 16M value was configured into the second during kconfig in "Physical address where the kernel is loaded" as 0x1000000. [root@zmei]: kexec -p vmlinux --args-linux --append="root=/dev/hda1 maxcpus=1 init 1" kexec_load failed: Cannot assign requested address entry = 0x1498 flags = 1 nr_segments = 4 segment[0].buf = 0x8067ba0 segment[0].bufsz = 80c0 segment[0].mem = 0x1000 segment[0].memsz = a000 segment[1].buf = 0x806fd80 segment[1].bufsz = 1000 segment[1].mem = 0xb000 segment[1].memsz = 1000 segment[2].buf = 0xb6dbc008 segment[2].bufsz = 3d619c segment[2].mem = 0x1000000 segment[2].memsz = 3d7000 segment[3].buf = 0xb7193008 segment[3].bufsz = 2b086 segment[3].mem = 0x13d8000 segment[3].memsz = 55000 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/