Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261863AbVEKBdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 21:33:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261872AbVEKBdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 21:33:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:11712 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261863AbVEKBdl (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2005 21:33:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 21:33:34 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Eric Piel Cc: Jan De Luyck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, linux@dominikbrodowski.net Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Message-ID: <20050511013334.GB8039@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Eric Piel , Jan De Luyck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, linux@dominikbrodowski.net References: <200503140829.04750.lkml@kcore.org> <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1590 Lines: 40 On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:57:52AM +0100, Eric Piel wrote: > Jan De Luyck a ?crit : > >Hello lists, > > > >(please cc me from cpufreq list) > > > >I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work > >fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my processor > >speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top > >-d 1). > : > : > >Any hints? > You can try the three attached patches in the order : > ondemand-cleanup-factorise-idle-measurement-2.6.11.patch > ondemand-save-idle-up-for-all-cpu-2.6.11.patch > ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-accepted.patch > > They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access > it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that > Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem > (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous > patches). Please, let me know if it works. > > BTW, DaveJ, Dominik, I couldn't find them in the daily-snapshot > available at codemonkey.org.uk. Should I worry, or is it just due to > some latency between your private trees and the public one? I'm preparing the first cpufreq->linus sync right now. Can you write up some descriptions & signed-off-by: lines for these three please ? Thanks, Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/