Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 19:32:32 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Yani Ioannou <yani.ioannou@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>,
       Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
       LM Sensors <sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 1/3] dynamic sysfs callbacks
Message-ID: <20050511023232.GA7273@kroah.com>
References: <253818670505070621784dbd63@mail.gmail.com> <20050510221615.GA4613@kroah.com> <2538186705051017132b6d1909@mail.gmail.com> <253818670505101759f4db08d@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <253818670505101759f4db08d@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1074
Lines: 27

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:59:32PM -0400, Yani Ioannou wrote:
> On further reflection, how about I work off this patch for now and for
> each of the derived attributes submit a separate patch implementing
> the callbacks, etc for that attribute along with an example patch
> showing how it can be used to benefit some existing code (these
> already exist for device and class attributes, so I'll resubmit those
> examples).
> 
> This way we can be sure that we aren't changing any of the derived
> attributes needlessly, and it presents a better view of exactly what
> changes I'm making to others I suppose :-).

That sounds great, and is what I was trying to get at.

> We should probably document this change somehow in the sysfs
> documentation at some point too.

Yeah, documentation, what a concept... :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/